Teaching method preferences of first year medical students in a medical college in India
Keywords:
Learning preference in hematology, VARK, MBBS students
Abstract
Background:Experiments in labs are usually taught using personality models, information processing models, social interaction models and instructional preference models. This study uses the VARK- visual, auditory, read/write, and kinaesthetic inventory to gather information as per instructional preference model for assessing learning preferences among first MBBS students with reference to hematology experiments.Aim:This study is designed to evaluate and compare instructional learning style preferences of first and second semester medical students in a peripheral medical college in IndiaMethod:This study was conducted on first and second semester MBBS students with each group having 75 students each. VARK inventory version 7.1 was administered to determine the preferred instructional mode based upon the four sensory modalities- visual, auditory, read/write and kinaesthetic with reference to hematology experiments.Results:80% of the first semester students had unimodal learning preferences out of which 10%, 50%, 5% and 15% students preferred visual, auditory, read/write and kinaesthetic modes respectively. In comparison, significantly higher percentage (50%) of second semester students had multimodal learning preferences. Their unimodal learning preference was 5% visual, 5% auditory, 5% read/write and 15% kinaesthetic modes. First semester students’ auditory instructional style as the most preferred method, whereas the second semester students preferred the kinaesthetic mode.Conclusion:With the passage of time in the medical course, students adapt to a multimodal method of instruction.It is therefore in the interest of students to strengthen, encourage and adopt a multimodal approach to lab teaching rather than resorting to conservative unimodal approach. DOI: 10.21276/AAMS.1906References
1. Keefe JW , Learning style: theory and practice. Virginia; National association of secondary school principals; 1987
2. Fleming ND. VARK: A guide to learning styles; www.varklearn.com/english/page.asp?p_questionnaire; 2007
3. Manisha Jindal, Poonam Kharb, Samanta PP. Comparative analysis of instructional learning preferences of medical students of first and seventh semester; 2013, International Journal of Physiology vol 1 no.1 32-36
4. Shah C, Joshi N, Mehta HB, Gokhale PA. Learning styles adopted by medical students. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2011; 2(12):227-229
5. Kumar L, Voralu K, Pani S, Sethuraman K. Predominant learning styles adopted by AIMST university students in Malaysia South East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2009; 3: 37-46
6. Nuzhat A, Salem RO, Mohammad SA, Nasir Al Hamdan. Learning style preferences of medical students: A single institute experience from Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Edu. 2011;2:70-73
2. Fleming ND. VARK: A guide to learning styles; www.varklearn.com/english/page.asp?p_questionnaire; 2007
3. Manisha Jindal, Poonam Kharb, Samanta PP. Comparative analysis of instructional learning preferences of medical students of first and seventh semester; 2013, International Journal of Physiology vol 1 no.1 32-36
4. Shah C, Joshi N, Mehta HB, Gokhale PA. Learning styles adopted by medical students. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2011; 2(12):227-229
5. Kumar L, Voralu K, Pani S, Sethuraman K. Predominant learning styles adopted by AIMST university students in Malaysia South East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2009; 3: 37-46
6. Nuzhat A, Salem RO, Mohammad SA, Nasir Al Hamdan. Learning style preferences of medical students: A single institute experience from Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Edu. 2011;2:70-73
Published
2018-03-16
Issue
Section
Original Article
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).