A Comparison of Various Current Electronic Apex Locators to Determine the Working Length by Using the Clearing Technique
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the accuracy of Dentaport ZX, Woodpex Electronic Apex Locators in establishing the major foramen using clearing technique Methods: Thirty Maxillary and Mandibular human extracted teeth with a single root straight canal were used and decoronation were done up to CEJ with a diamond disc, 15 samples of teeth from each group were embedded in a dentulous model and alginate was placed in it to stimulate periodontium . Working length estimation was done by “Woodpex, Dentaport ZX Electronic Apex Locators” – models placed in 5% Nitric acid for 24,48 and 72 hours, then transferred to ethanol solution of concentration(80,90,100%) and stored in 0.2% Methyl salicylate. Distance between tip of file and major foramen was measured by using image analysis and values were listed to statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out by using tests of chi square test, kruskal wallis test, Z test to compare results between two groups. All the data was expressed as Mean ± SD and the difference of p≤ 0.05. Values obtained were analyzed by using image analysis software program Result: Accuracy were 100% for the Denta port ZX compared to Wood pex in detecting major foramen Conclusion: Accuracy of Dentaport ZX was higher compared to wood pex. Dentaport ZX located the major foramen with 100% accuracy within the range of 0.5mm.There is greater distance from the major foramen in woodpex group when compared to dentaport ZX.References
Altunbas, Arslan, Kustarci - Comparison of various current electronic apex locator to determine working length using clearing technique. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:42-50.
Tinaz AC, Alaçam T, Topuz O. A simple model to demonstrate the electronic apex locator. Int Endod J 2002;35:940‑5.
Pierre Machtou, Nick Adams, Philip Tomson. Apical limit and working length in Endodontics – Dent Update 2009;36:146-153
Grossman Endodontic Practice – 13th Edition
Baswaraj, Harikumar, Biradhar Electronic Apex Locators – A Review Pravara Med Rev 2017;9: 21-25
Jenkins JA, Walker WA, Schindler WG, Flores CM. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the root ZX in the presence of various irrigants. J Endod 2001;27:209‑11.
Mayeda DL, Simon JH, Aimar DF, Finley K. In vivo measurement accuracy in vital and necrotic canals with the Endex apex locator. J Endod 1993;19:545‑8.
Ebrahim AK, Wadachi R, Suda H. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth. Aust Endod J 2007;33:7‑12.
Akanksha Bhatt, Vishesh Gupta Working length determination – The soul of root canal therapy : A review . Int J Dent Health Sci 2015;2:105-115.
Pascon EA, Marrelli M, Congi O, Ciancio R, Miceli F, An in vivo comparison of working length determination of two frequency‑based electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2009;42:1026‑31.
Manuele Mancini, Roberto Felici, Gabriele Conte. Accuracy of Three Electronic Apex Locators in Anterior and Posterior Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study-J Endod 2011;37:684–687.
M. P. J. Gordon & N. P. Chandler REVIEW Electronic apex locators- Int Endod J 2004;37:426-437.
Nekoofar, Ghandi, Hayes .The fundamental operating principles of Electronic root canal length measurement devices – Int Endod J 2006;39:595-609.
Hale cimil, Seda, Burcin,Gonca Accuracy of the Dentaport ZX apex locator for working length determination when retreating molar root canals- Aust Endod J 2014;40:2-5.
Saddy Mosco, Keneth, Joan,Carios - Evaluation of Dentaport ZX and Raypex 6
electronic apex locators: An in vivo study - Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:202-5.
Ebrahim, Wadachi An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of Dentaport ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals - Aust Endod J 2007;52:193-197.
Jenkins JA, Walker WA 3rd, Schindler WG, Flores CM. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of the root ZX in the presence of various irrigants. J Endod 2001;27:209‑11.
Anthony Meares, Robert Steimann The Influence of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation on
the Accuracy of the Root ZX Electronic Apex Locator- J Endod 2002;28:324-325.
Tselnik M, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. An evaluation of root ZX and elements diagnostic apex locators. J Endod 2005;31:507 9.
ElAyouti A, Weiger R, Löst C. Frequency of over instrumentation with an acceptable radiographic working length. J Endod 2001;27:49 52.
Somma F, Castagnola R, Lajolo C, Paternò Holtzman L, Marigo L. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raype×5 and ProPex II. Int Endod J 2012;45:552 6.
Cianconi L, Angotti V, Felici R, Conte G, Mancini M. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators compared with digital radiography: an ex vivo study. J Endod 2010;36:2003-7.
Jakobson SJ, Westpalhen VPD, da Silva Neto UX, Fariniuk LF, Picoli F, Carneiro E. The accuracy in the control of the apical extent of rotary canal instrumentation using Root ZX and ProTaper instru¬ments: an in vivo study. J Endod 2008;34:1342-5.
Dunlap CA, Remeikis NA, BeGole EA, Rauschenberger CR. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals. J Endod 1998;24:48–50.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).