A Conglomerate of Pathology in Placental Disorders

  • Gudeli Vahini asram medical college,elluru
  • I.V. Renuka
Keywords: PLACENTA, Pathology, Fetal, Maternal

Abstract

Background: There is a vast diversity in placental pathology and several factors contribute to this diversity. A detailed placental examination is mandatory to assess any disorder and predict fetal outcome. Aims and objectives: To study the placental pathology in various maternal, fetal and placental disorders and also the fetal outcome in these conditions. Materials and methods: A one and a half year prospective study of fifty consecutive placentae was done. A proforma was prepared with relevant clinical details. Maternal, fetal, placental risk factors were analyzed along with gross and microscopic lesions. Appropriate sections were taken from representative sites and Hematoxylin and eosin, Periodic acid Schiff stains were done. Results:  Out of fifty cases of placentae studied, forty seven cases (94%) showed evidence of pathology associated with maternal, fetal and placental risk factors, either singly or in combination. Maternal risk factors were twenty five cases (50%) of which the highest percentage being pregnancy related (84 %). Grossly infarcts and retro placental hematomas were common findings. Histological features of accelerated maturation were lesions commonly seen in these cases. In cases where the fetal outcome was poor like in abortions, intrauterine fetal death and still births all (100%) placentae were abnormal. Conclusions: In this study high percentage of placentae showed evidence of pathology, the majority of which were associated with maternal, fetal or placental risk factors either singly or in combination. Those cases in which fetal outcome were poor all the placentae were abnormal. A careful examination of placentae is required as it is a clue for various diseases and to determine fetal outcome. Histopathological examination of both gross and microscopy proved to be valuable tools in determining placental pathology.

Author Biographies

Gudeli Vahini, asram medical college,elluru
Dept of Pathology, Asram Medical College, Eluru, India
I.V. Renuka
Professor, NRI medical college, Chinakakani, Guntur, India

References

1. Avasthi K, Micha U. histopathology of placenta and its correlation with fetal outcome.J Obstetric Gynaecol Ind 1991;41:317.
2. Salafia C, Pezznlto J. Placental pathologic features of preterm eclampsia. Am J Obstetric Gynaecol 1995;173:1097.
3. Das B,Dutta D.Placental morphology in hypertension disorders of pregnancy and its correlation with fetal outcome. J Obstetrics Gynaecol Ind 1996;45:230.
4. Joshi VV. Handbook of placental pathology. Igaku shon medical publisher 1994.
5. Shanklin DR,Scott JS .Massive subchorionic thrombohematoma (Brues’ mole).Br J
obstetric gynaecol 1975;82:476
6. Fox H. Pathology of the Placenta. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA; 1978.
7. Andres R, Kuyper W. The association of maternal floor infarction of the placenta with
adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstetr Gynaecol 1990;163:935.
8. Naeye R. Maternal floor infarct.Hum Pathol. 1985 Aug;16(8):823-8.
9.Bandana Das, D.Dutta, S.Chakraborthy,P.Nath.placental morphology in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and its correlation with fetal outcome.J Obstet and Gynecol India,1996;46(1):40-46.
10.Udainia A,Bhagwat SS, Mehta CD.Relation between placental surface area,infarction and fetal distress in pregnancy induced hypertension with its clinical relevance.J Anat Soc Ind 2004,53;1:27-30.
11.Naeye RL,friedman EA.Causes of perinatal death associated with gestational hypertension and proteinuria.Am J obst and Gynaecol,1979;133:8-11.
12.Fox H.General pathology of placenta.obstetrics and gynaecological pathology ed.New york:Churchill livingstone;1995.page 1447-1508.
13.Mohan harsh,sodhis,Mohan PS,et al.Fetal correlation with placental pathology in toxaemia of pregnancy.J obstetrics and gynaecology India 1989;39:170-75.
14.Sodhi s,Mohan H,Jaiswal TS,Mohan PS,Rathee S.Placental pathology in pre-eclampsia eclampsia syndrome.Indian J Pathol Microbiol Jan 1990; 33(1):11-6.
Published
2018-05-21
Section
Original Article