Factors Affecting Lymph Node Yield in Surgically Resected Colorectal Cancer Specimens
Abstract
Background: Currently, the CAP protocol mandates evaluation of ≥12 Lymph nodes as a quality indicator for the adequacy of pathologic examination of colorectal cancer resection specimens. Aim: To identify factors that may influence the lymph node yield in colorectal cancer specimens and to compare with the relevant publications. Methods: The retrospective study of seventy patients with loco-regional colorectal adenocarcinomas treated by standard surgical resection from April 2015- April 2017 was included. All cases with inadequate lymph nodes had been re-grossed by another pathologist. Variables like age, gender, primary site, type of surgery, specimen length, tumour size, grade and stage, neoadjuvant therapy and tumour site perforation were evaluated for their impact on the average total number of nodes examined. Results: Out of seventy, eleven [15.71%] patients had inadequate mean nodal yield [MNY]. Of these eleven patients, MNY was greater in males [6.6] than in females [6.4]. MNY was lesser in patients with age >50years [5.71] than patients ≤ 50 years [8]. The yield increased exponentially with increasing tumour stage and tumour size. Yield was higher in tumours with perforation. Specimens longer than 20cm had a higher yield [7.29] than in shorter specimens [5.25]. The yield was lesser when tumour is located more distally [APR:4.5 and AR &sigmoid colectomy:7.7]. Seven patients had taken neoadjuvant therapy [63.6%] of whom, six had moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma & one had no tumour. Conclusion: Factors like neoadjuvant therapy, age & gender of the patient, type of surgery, length of the specimen, tumour size, grade, stage, site & perforation, affect the MNY in colorectal cancers.References
College of American Pathologists. Protocol for Examination of Specimens From Patients With Primary Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum. Version: ColoRectum 3.4.0.0. CAP; 2016. Available from: https://documents.cap.org/protocols/cp-colon-rectum-2016-v3400.pdf. [Last assessed on: 2017 September 9]
Mark L H Ong and John B Schofield. Assessment of Lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8[3]:179–192 . [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i3.179]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in Oncology. Principles of pathologic review for colon and rectal cancer. NCCN clinical practice guidelines Version 2.2016. Available from: https://www2.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/archive/colorectal2016/english/rectal.pdf. [Last assessed on: 2017 September 9]
Deodhar KK, Budukh A, Ramadwar M, Bal MM, Shrikhande S V. Are we achieving the benchmark of retrieving 12 Lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma specimens? Experience from a tertiary referral center in India and review of literature. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2012; 55:38-42. 2
Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY, Zhu J, Bailey HR, Schwartz MR. Number of Lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133[5]:781–786.
Wong SL. Lymph node counts and survival rates after resection for colon and rectal cancer. Gastrointestinal Cancer Research : GCR. 2009; 3[2 Suppl]:S33-35.
Mekenkamp LJM, van Krieken JHJM, Marijnen CAM, van de Velde CJH, Nagtegaal ID, Pathology Review Committee and the Co-operative Clinical Investigators. Lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer is dependent on many factors--the role of the tumor, the patient, the surgeon, the radiotherapist, and the pathologist. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33[10]:1547–1553.
Chou JF, Row D, Gonen M, Liu Y-H, Schrag D, Weiser MR. Clinical and pathologic factors that predict Lymph node yield from surgical specimens in colorectal cancer: a population-based study: A population-based study. Cancer. 2010;116[11]:2560–2570.
Leung AM, Scharf AW, Vu HN. Factors affecting number of Lymph nodes harvested in colorectal cancer. J Surg Res. 2011;168[2]:224–230.
Morcos B, Baker B, Al Masri M, Haddad H, Hashem S. Lymph node yield in rectal cancer surgery: effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36[4]:345–349.
Orsenigo E, Gasparini G, Carlucci M. Clinicopathological factors influencing Lymph node yield in colorectal cancer: A retrospective study. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019; 2019:5197914.
Shen SS, Haupt BX, Ro JY, Zhu J, Bailey HR, Schwartz MR. Number of Lymph nodes examined and associated clinicopathologic factors in colorectal carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133[5]:781-786.
Gurawalia J, Dev K, Nayak SP, Kurpad V, Pandey A. Less than 12 Lymph nodes in the surgical specimen after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy: an indicator of tumor regression in locally advanced rectal cancer? J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;7[6]:946–957
Leung CAW, Fazzi GE, Melenhorst J, Rennspiess D, Grabsch HI. Acetone clearance of mesocolic or mesorectal fat increases Lymph node yield and may improve detection of high-risk Stage II colorectal cancer patients. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20[11]:1014–1019.
Wood P, Peirce C, Mulsow J. Non-surgical factors influencing Lymph node yield in colon cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;8[5]:466–73.
Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Schmitt SL, Nogueras JJ, Lucas FV. Effect of xylene clearance of mesenteric fat on harvest of Lymph nodes after colonic resection. Eur J Surg. 1994;160[12]:693–697.
Törnroos A, Shabo I, Druvefors B, Arbman G, Olsson H. Postoperative intra-arterial methylene blue injection of colorectal cancer specimens increases the number of Lymph nodes recovered: Methylene blue improves Lymph node recovery. Histopathology. 2011;58[3]:408–413.
Wright FC, Law CHL, Last LD, Ritacco R, Kumar D, Hsieh E, et al. Barriers to optimal assessment of Lymph nodes in colorectal cancer specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;121[5]:663–70.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).
