Pattern of Leprosy: A Histomorphological Study with Clinical Correlation in Ajmer District

  • Bhawika Menghani Department of Pathology, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
  • Abha Gupta Department of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
  • Neena Kasliwal Department of Pathology, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
  • Rahul Gupta Department of Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
Keywords: Leprosy, Ridley Jopling classification, Histopathology

Abstract

Background: Leprosy (Hansen’s disease) still continues to be an important public health problem. The present study was carried to correlate histological diagnosis of skin biopsies of untreated leprosy cases with clinical diagnosis using Ridley- Jopling classification. Material and Methods: 124 skin biopsies of untreated leprosy cases over a period of 6 years were included. Paraffin sections of biopsies were stained with Haematoxylin & Eosin, Ziehl- Neelsen’s & Fite stains examined and classified histopathologically according to Ridley- Jopling scale and then correlated with clinical diagnosis.   Results: Prevalence rate of leprosy in Ajmer district is 0.16 per 10,000 population per annum. Among the 124 biopsies, most cases were of indeterminate type (39.51%), followed by LL type (17.74%), TT type (16.93%), BT type (10.48%), BL type (07.25%), BB type (05.64%), histioid type (2.41%). Most commonly the patients were affected in 4th decade of life. Male and female ratio was 2.26:1. Most common clinical presentation was anesthesia.   Conclusion: Correlation of clinical and histopathological features along with bacteriological index appears more useful for accurate typing of leprosy than considering any of the single parameters alone. This helps the clinician for better care and management of the patients.

References

Rees RJW, Yound DB. The Microbiology of leprosy. In: Hastings RC, Opromolla DVA. Editors, leprosy, 2nd ed, New York, Churchill Livingstone;1994. p.49-83.

P. Narasimha Rao, Sujai Suneetha. Current situations of leprosy in India and its future implications. Indian Dermatol Online J.2018; 9(2): 83-89.

Ganapathy R, Revankar CR. Leprosy, Controle. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, Editors, Textbook and Atlas of Dermatology, Bombay Bhalani Publishing House;1994. p.1427-1437.

Polycarpou A, Walker SL, Lockwood DN. The clinical and immunological features of leprosy. BrMed Bull 2006; 78:103-21.

Tiwari M, Ranabhat S, Maharjan S. Clinico-histopathological correlation of leprosy: A retrospective study of skin biopsy specimens in Chitwan Medical College. Inter J Medical Sci Res Prac. 2015; 2(1):8-11.

Nayak SV, Shivarudrappa AS, Nagarajapa AH, Sacchidanand S, Ahmed SM. Role of modified rapid AFB method in histopathological sections of hansen’s disease. Ind J Dermatol Venerol Leprol 2003; 69:173-4.

Shantaram B, Yawalkar SJ. Leprosy Differential disgnosis. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, editors. Textbook and atlas of Dermatology. Bombay Bhalani Publishing house;1994. p.1385-91.

Ridley DS, Jopling WH. Classification of leprosy according to immunity: a five-group system. Int J Lepr 1966; 34:255.

Fite GL, Mansfield RE. The role of histopathology in the study of leprosy. Arch Dermatol 1969; 100:178-83.

Britton WJ, Lockwood DNJ. Leprosy. Lancet 2004; 363:1209-1219.

Mitra K, Biswas S, Saha B, Dasgupta A. Correlation between clinical and histopathological criteria for the classification of leprosy. Ind J Dermatol Venerol Leprol 2001; 16:135-7.

Noordeen SK. The epidemiology of leprosy. In: Hastings RC, editor, leprosy.New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1985.p.15-29.

Suneetha S, Arundhati S, Chandi S, Kurian N, Chacco CJG. Histological studies in primary neuritic leprosy: Changes in the apparent normal skin. Lepr Rev 1998; 69:351-357.

Sharma Anuja, Sharma RK, Goswami KC, Bhardwaj Subhash. Clinicohistopathological correlation in leprosy. JK SCIENCE, July- September 2008; 10(9):120-23.

Gupte MD. Leprosy: Epidemiology. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, editors, Textbook and atlas of Dermatology. 2nd ed. Mumbai: Bhalani Publishing House; 2001.p.1543-1552.

Sehgal VN, Gorpade A, Saha K. Urban leprosy an appraisal from Northern India. Lepr Rev 1984; 55:159-166.

Vargas-Ocampo F. Analysis of 6000 skin biopsies of the National Leprosy Control Programme in Mexico. Int J Lepr 2004; 72(4):427-430.

Verma OP. Some epidemiological features of leprosy in a rural area in Hoogly district. Lepr India 1976; 48(4): 371-81.

Gurubasavaraj H, Kumar P, Shashikala PS, Shivamurthy V. Histomorphological study of leprosy. Afr J Med Health Sci 2013; 12:68-73.

Chaturvedi RM. Epidemiological study of leprosy in Mewani Suburb of Bombay. Lepr Rev 1984; 55:159-166.

Bhatia AS, Katoch K, Narayanan RB, Ramu G, Mukherjee A, Lavania RK. Clinical and histopathological correlation in the classification of leprosy. Int J Lepr 1993;61(3):433-38.

Gillis TP, Williams DL. Polymerase chain reaction and leprosy. Int J Lepr 1991;59(2):311-16.

Published
2021-03-31
Section
Original Article