Clinico Histopathological Correlation Study of Leprosy

  • Bharat Ankush Ghodke Department Of Pathology, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ group of Hospitals, Mumbai
  • Arvind G Valand Department Of Pathology, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ group of Hospitals, Mumbai(India)
  • Aradhana Bhubaneswar Deka Department Of Pathology, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ group of Hospitals, Mumbai(India)
  • Sushma Nagsen Ramraje Department Of Pathology, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ group of Hospitals, Mumbai(India)
  • Zeba Shamshad Ali Department Of Pathology, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ group of Hospitals, Mumbai(India)
Keywords: Tuberculoid, histopathology, leprosy, granuloma

Abstract

Background: Aim of the study was to study the histomorphological changes in leprosy, the clinicopathological correlation of different types of leprosy lesions and cases of clinically diagnosed lepra reaction.Methods: One hundred and twelve patients of clinically diagnosed leprosy were chosen. Skin biopsy was performed, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, processed, sectioned and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin as well as Modified Fite Faraco stain.Result: Of the one hundred and twelve patients enrolled in the study (age range from 7 to 70 years) 90 patients were males and 22 were females. All cases were classified according to the Ridley Jopling Scale. Correlation between clinical diagnosis and histopathological type of leprosy and lepra reactions was done.Conclusion: Leprosy is more common in males than in females having a ratio of 4:1.The commonest histopathological subgroup was tuberculoid leprosy.DOI: 10.21276/APALM.1645

Author Biography

Bharat Ankush Ghodke, Department Of Pathology, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ group of Hospitals, Mumbai
Blood Transfuion Officer (MD Pathology)Department of Pathology Sir JJ Group of Hospitals and GGMC, Mumbai

References

1. Panday AN, Tailor HJ. Clinicogistopathological correlation in leprosy. Ind J Dermatol Venerol Leprol 2008; 74: 174-76
2. Marcy-Rovenour; Public Health & Preventive Medicine. Jaipee Medical Publisher; Pg: 218-222; 1998.
3. Dharmendra; History of Spread and Decline of Leprosy; 24-26; Classification and Clinical Manifestation of Leprosy; 319-346; Textbook of Leprosy; Kothari Medical Publishing House; 1978.
4. Park K. Textbook of preventive and social medicine.14 th edition, Jabalpur, Bhanot publishers.1999; 223-233.
5. World Health Organisation. Global burden of leprosy at the end of 2012. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2012;86:389-400.
6. Ridley DS, Jopling WH. Classification of leprosy according to immunity: a five group system, Int J Lepr Other Mycobacterial Disease, 1966,34:255-73.
7. Sehgal V.N, Rege V.L, Reys M; Correlation between clinical and histopathological classification in Leprosy; International Journal of Leprosy; Vol 45; 278 - 280.
8. Ashok SK., Reddy SN, Ratnakar C.; Correlation of Skin and Nerve Histopathology in Leprosy; Leprosy Review; 1996:67; 119 - 125;
9. Kaur S, Sharma VK; Concurrent skin and nerve histology in Leprosy and its role in the classification of Leprosy; Leprosy Review; 1993;110-16;.
10. Rao P.S.S, Karat A.B.A, Kaliaperumal V.G and Karat S; Prevalence of Leprosy in Gudiyatham Taluk, south India Part I. Specific rates with reference to Age, Sex and Type; 1772:40; 157-161;
11. Mathur N.K, Kanwar A.J, Kalla Gand Ujwal J.J;Leprosy in Jodhpur; Clinical and epidemiological study; Leprosy in India; 1978;204 - 209;.
12. Kar P.K, Arora P.N, Ramashastry C.V, Sayal S.K and Dhaka R.S; A Clinico-Pathological Study of Macular Lesions in Leprosy; 1994;66:435-442.
13. Bhatia A.S, Katoch K, Narayan R.B, Ramu G, Mukherjee A and Ravinder K. Lavania; Clinical and Histopathological Correlation in the Classification of Leprosy; Vol-61, 433-438.
14. Shenoi S.D and Sidappa K; Correlation of Clinical and Histopathological Features; 1998;202-206;.
15. Desikan K.V and Iyer C.G.S; Histoid Variety of Lepromatous Leprosy - A Histopathologic Study; Vol-40; 149-156.
16. Petit J.H.S and Waters M.F; The etiology of erythema nodosum leprosum; 1967:35(1); 1-9;.
17. Ganapati R., S. S. Pandya, S. S. Naik, V. V. Dongre and N.G. A. Desouza; Assessment of School Surveys as a method of case detection in an urban area endemic for Leprosy; 1977:732-736;.
18. Verma KC, Ganguli DD, Jain VK; Applicability of Ridley Jopling Scale in clinical practice, Leprosy in India 1981;556-560;.
19. Dubey G.K, Joglekar V.K, Grover S and Chaubey B.S; Correlation of Clinical and Histopathological studies in classification of Leprosy : Leprosy in India; 1981:53; 562-565;
20. Jerath VP, Desai SR. Diversities in clinical and histopathological classification of leprosy. Lepr India 1982; 54:30.
21. Singh K, Iyengar B, Singh R; Variation in Clinical and Histopathological Classification of Leprosy – A Report and a plausible explanation; 1983;55; 472-479;.
22. Sehgal VN, Gautam RK, Korane RV, Beohar PC; The Histopathology of Type I (Lepra) and Type II (ENL) reactions in Leprosy; Indian Journal Of Leprosy; 1986:58; 240-243;
Published
2017-12-22
Section
Original Article