2D:4D ratio in adult female and their comparison with males: An anthropometric study from Northern India.

Anamika Jaiswal; Ankit Kaushik; A K Singh

Anamika Jaiswal Government Medical College Haldwani, Nanital Uttarakhand
Ankit Kaushik Government Medical College Haldwani
A K Singh Government Medical College, Haldwani, Nanital uttarakhand

Keywords: 2D, 4D ratio, sexual dimorphism

Abstract

Background: 2D:4D ratio is a sexually dimorphic marker that act as potential marker of prenatal androgen exposure. Genital development in fetus depends on adequate and timely exposure to sex steroids. Assessment of fetal androgen levels and exposure are essential to predict normal development and future reproductive disorders. The 2D:4D ratio can be used to assess androgen action.Aim: This study attempts to find out 2D:4D ratio of left and right hand in adult females and males and to find out whether any difference exists among these variables in males and females.Methods: A total of 83 adults were included in the study. There were 51 females and 32 males. The distance of second finger and fourth finger was calculated from mid-point of proximal most digital crease to distal most end of the finger. The ratio was then obtained by dividing second finger length by fourth finger length. Result: The mean 2D: 4D ratio of left hand and right hand in adult female were 0.98 and 0.99 respectively. The mean 2D: 4D ratio of left hand and right hand in adult male were 0.967 and 0.99 respectively. The males have lower 2D:4D ratio for left and right hand as compared to females. The mean 2D:4D ratio of left hand and right hand in left handed females were 0.99 and 1.01 respectively while mean 2D:4D ratio of left hand and right hand in right handed females were 0.987 and 0.99. The mean 2D:4D ratio of left hand and right hand in left handed males were 0.96 and 0.98 respectively while mean 2D:4D ratio of left hand and right hand in right handed males were 0.98 and 1.01.Conclusion: Sexually dimorphic markers are variables that can be used as indirect marker of fetal androgen exposure. In this study the mean 2D:4D ratio in males for both left and right hand was lower than females in overall group and in case of both right and left handedness males and females. Male fetuses with higher testosterone levels will have a lower 2D:4D ratio. Digital ratio is an easy noninvasive parameter, abnormal 2D:4D ratio in females can predict excessive androgen action.

References

1. Mayhew TM, Gillam L, McDonald R, Ebling FJ. Human 2D (index) and 4D (ring) digit lengths: their variation and relationships during the menstrual cycle. Journal of Anatomy. 2007;211(5):630–38.
2. Bailey Allison A, Hurd PL. Depression in men is associated with more feminine finger length ratios. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39(4):829–36.
3. Manning JT, Stewart AG, Bundred P, Trivers R. Sex and ethnic differences in 2nd to 4th digit ratio of children. Early Human Development. 2004;80(2):161–68.
4. Thankamony A, Pasterski V, Ong KK, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology. 2016;4:616-25.
5. Dean A, Sharpe RM. Clinical review: Anogenital distance or digit length ratio as measures of fetal androgen exposure: relationship to male reproductive development and its disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):2230-8.
6. Xi H, Li M, Fan Y, Zhao L. A comparison of measurement methods and sexual dimorphism for digit ratio (2D: 4D) in Han ethnicity. Archives of Sexual Behavior.2014;43(2):329–33.
7. Jeevanandam S, Prathibha K Muthu PK. 2D:4D Ratio and its Implications in Medicine.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Dec; 10(12): CM01–CM03.
8. Sinclair AH, Berta P, Palmer MS, Hawkins JR, Griffiths BL, Smith MJ, et al. A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif. Nature. 1990;346(6281):240-4.
9. Blaschko SD, Cunha GR, Baskin LS. Molecular mechanisms of external genitalia development. Differentiation. 2012 Oct;84(3):261-8.
10. Wilson JD, Griffin JE, Leshin M, George FW. Role of gonadal hormones in development of the sexual phenotypes. Hum Genet. 1981;58(1):78-84.
11. Goldman AS, Bongiovanni AM. Induced genital anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967;142:755-67.
12. Loehlin JC, Medland SE, Martin NG. Is CAG sequence length in the androgen receptor gene correlated with finger-length ratio? Personality and Individual Differences. 2012;52(2):224–27.
13. Rebecca B, Benson PJ. Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and the spatial representation of magnitude. Hormones and Behavior. 2006;50(2):194–9.
14. Jacob M, Avadhani R, Nair B, Nallathamby R, Soman MA. Cross sectional study of second and fourth digit ratio with physical attributes in South Indian population. Int J Anat Res. 2015;3(2):1133–7.
15. Ciumas C, Lindén Hirschberg A, Savic I. High fetal testosterone and sexually dimorphic cer-ebral networks in females. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(5):1164–72.
16. Coyne SM, Manning JT, Ringer L, Bailey L. Directional asymmetry (right–left differences) in digit ratio (2D: 4D) predict indirect aggression in women. Personality and Individual Dif-ferences. 2007;43(4):865–72.
17. Trivers R, Manning J, Jacobson A. A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D: 4D) and other fin-ger ratios in Jamaican children. Hormones and Behavior. 2006;49(2):150–56.
18. Oyeyemi BF, Iyiola OA, Oyeyemi AW, Oricha KA, Anifowoshe AT, Alamukii NA. Sexual dimorphism in ratio of second and fourth digits and its relationship with metabolic syndrome indices and cardiovascular risk factors. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences : The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. 2014;19(3):234-9.