Utility of Interactive Teaching Tools in Classroom Teaching-A Review of literature
Keywords:
Medical education, Medical education technology, interactivity, interactive teaching tools
Abstract
Change in medical education is needed to prepare doctors to meet the challenges of changing trends in the health care delivery system.Most of the medical schools have traditional, teacher-centered training.Most of the current undergraduate training is didactic and pedagogical, with the teacher as a source of information, which encourages students for surface learning.The most popular and widespread teaching method is lecturing.In a lecture, learners are passive.It haslowestretention value of all teaching techniques.After reviewing literature, it was noted from various studies that incorporation of various interactive techniques, viz,brainstorming,think pair and share,Multiple choice questions,role play, word puzzles, quiz, group tasks,Problem based learning,case based learning help to achieve learning objectives in a student centric manner..Also, from review of literature it is found that interactivity makes the students more attentive and enthusiastic. Incorporation of interactivity in lectures has been found to improve teaching-learning process by educators who utilized interactivity in classroom teaching.Interactive teaching in medical education is need of hour to be introduce to achieve goals of learning outcomes of undergraduate teaching.DOI: 10.21276/AABS.2017.1345References
1. Majumder A, D'Souza U, Rahman S. Trends in medical education: Challenges and directions for need-based reforms of medical training in South-East Asia. Indian J Med Sci 2004;58:369-80
2. Majumder MA. Today’s students tomorrow’s physician: Emerging challenges for undergraduate medical education. Bangladesh med J 2003;32:84-7.
3. Majumder MA. Medical Education in Bangladesh: Past Successes, Future Challenges. Bangladesh Med J 2003; 32:37-9.
4. Majumder MA. Issues and priorities of Medical Education Research in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004;33:257-63
5. Barrows HS, Tamblyn R. Problem-based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer, 1980.
6. Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner-centered approach in medical education. BMJ 1999; 318:1280-3.
7. Knowles M. The adult learner: a neglected species.4th ed. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1990.
8. Regehr G. Norman GR. Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med 1996; 71:988-1001.
9. Michael Hegarty, Anne Phelan, Lisa Kilbride.Blueprint for Interactive Classrooms.In Classrooms for Distance Teaching and Learning - A Blueprint.Belgium:Leuven University Press,1998. (Site updated: 30 April 2002) available from:http://bic.avnet.kuleuven.be/products/handbook/handbookchapters/08chapter2.html
10. Wagner, J. Learning from a distance, The International Journal of Multimedia, 1994;19 (2): 12-20.
11. Daniel, J., C. Marquis. Independence and interaction: Getting the mix right, Teaching at a Distance, 1993;15:445-460.
12. Moore, M. Editorial: distance education theory, The American Journal of Distance Education.1991; 5(3): 1-6.
13. Wagner, E.D In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education,1994; 8(2): 6 – 26.
14. Mark wood, R. S. John stone. New Pathways to a degree: Technology opens the college, Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications, Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Boulder, CO.1994
15 Barnard, R. Interactive Learning: A Key to successful distance delivery, The American Journal of Multimedia, 1995;12: 45 – 47.
16 Parker, Angie. Interaction in Distance Education: The critical conversation, Education Technology Review.1999; 13.
17 Bluurton, C. New Directions of ICT –use in education, UNESCO’s World Communication and Information Report 1999.
18. Moore, M. Three types of interaction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 1992;3 (2):1-6.
19. Moore, M. Theory of transactional distance Education.In Desmond Keegan (Ed) Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, London & New York: Routledge. 1993 p:22-38
20. Anderson, T., and Garrison, D. R. Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance Learners in Higher Education. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.1998.p.97-112
21.Matthew L Costa, Lee Van Rensburg, Neil Rushton.Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching.Medical Education2007;41(2):214–217
22. Gary Beauchamp,Steve Kennewell. Interactivity in classroom and itsimpact on learning.Computers and education 2010:54(3): 759-766.
23.BuchAC,ChandanwaleSS,BamnikarSA.Interactiveteaching:Understanding perspectives of II MBBS students in Pathology.Med. J DY PatilUniv2014;7:693-695
24.Gupta A, BhattiK,WaliaR,AgnihotriP,KaushalS.Implementation of Interactive Teaching Learning Methods in Large Group in Endocrine Pharmacology.Ind J Pharmac and Pharmaco ,October-December 2015;2(4);197-202
25.Kaur D, Singh J, Seema,MahajanA,KaurG.Role of interactive teaching in Medical Education .Inter J Basic and App Med Scie,Sept- Dec 2011;1(1):54-60
2. Majumder MA. Today’s students tomorrow’s physician: Emerging challenges for undergraduate medical education. Bangladesh med J 2003;32:84-7.
3. Majumder MA. Medical Education in Bangladesh: Past Successes, Future Challenges. Bangladesh Med J 2003; 32:37-9.
4. Majumder MA. Issues and priorities of Medical Education Research in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004;33:257-63
5. Barrows HS, Tamblyn R. Problem-based Learning: An Approach to Medical Education. New York: Springer, 1980.
6. Spencer JA, Jordan RK. Learner-centered approach in medical education. BMJ 1999; 318:1280-3.
7. Knowles M. The adult learner: a neglected species.4th ed. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing, 1990.
8. Regehr G. Norman GR. Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med 1996; 71:988-1001.
9. Michael Hegarty, Anne Phelan, Lisa Kilbride.Blueprint for Interactive Classrooms.In Classrooms for Distance Teaching and Learning - A Blueprint.Belgium:Leuven University Press,1998. (Site updated: 30 April 2002) available from:http://bic.avnet.kuleuven.be/products/handbook/handbookchapters/08chapter2.html
10. Wagner, J. Learning from a distance, The International Journal of Multimedia, 1994;19 (2): 12-20.
11. Daniel, J., C. Marquis. Independence and interaction: Getting the mix right, Teaching at a Distance, 1993;15:445-460.
12. Moore, M. Editorial: distance education theory, The American Journal of Distance Education.1991; 5(3): 1-6.
13. Wagner, E.D In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education,1994; 8(2): 6 – 26.
14. Mark wood, R. S. John stone. New Pathways to a degree: Technology opens the college, Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications, Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, Boulder, CO.1994
15 Barnard, R. Interactive Learning: A Key to successful distance delivery, The American Journal of Multimedia, 1995;12: 45 – 47.
16 Parker, Angie. Interaction in Distance Education: The critical conversation, Education Technology Review.1999; 13.
17 Bluurton, C. New Directions of ICT –use in education, UNESCO’s World Communication and Information Report 1999.
18. Moore, M. Three types of interaction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 1992;3 (2):1-6.
19. Moore, M. Theory of transactional distance Education.In Desmond Keegan (Ed) Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, London & New York: Routledge. 1993 p:22-38
20. Anderson, T., and Garrison, D. R. Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance Learners in Higher Education. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.1998.p.97-112
21.Matthew L Costa, Lee Van Rensburg, Neil Rushton.Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching.Medical Education2007;41(2):214–217
22. Gary Beauchamp,Steve Kennewell. Interactivity in classroom and itsimpact on learning.Computers and education 2010:54(3): 759-766.
23.BuchAC,ChandanwaleSS,BamnikarSA.Interactiveteaching:Understanding perspectives of II MBBS students in Pathology.Med. J DY PatilUniv2014;7:693-695
24.Gupta A, BhattiK,WaliaR,AgnihotriP,KaushalS.Implementation of Interactive Teaching Learning Methods in Large Group in Endocrine Pharmacology.Ind J Pharmac and Pharmaco ,October-December 2015;2(4);197-202
25.Kaur D, Singh J, Seema,MahajanA,KaurG.Role of interactive teaching in Medical Education .Inter J Basic and App Med Scie,Sept- Dec 2011;1(1):54-60
Published
2017-02-28
Issue
Section
Review Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
