Diagnosis of Endophthalmitis with amplification of syndrome specific signature genes by Syndrome Evaluation System: A Retrospective Analysis
Keywords:
Endophthalmitis, Syndrome Evaluation System, Vitrectomy
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the microbiological concordance of clinically diagnosed endophthalmitis cases using isolation of genetic material of the causative agent from either aqueous or vitreous fluid and simultaneous amplification of syndrome specific signature genes.Methods: Thirteen cases clinically diagnosed as endophthalmitis at tertiary centre of Vitreo-Retina care, in whom isolation of genetic material of the causative agent from either aqueous or vitreous fluid and simultaneous amplification of syndrome specific signature genes termed as Syndrome evaluation system (SES) was carried out were included in this retrospective analysis. The vitrectomy samples or Aqueous taps were sent to for SES analysis and results were obtained within 24 hours of vitrectomy and results considered for deciding treatment. Results: 7 out of 13 cases were positive for bacteria or fungi or virus when tested on SES. Out of Seven positive two were also culture positive and concordant. Three out of these seven positives did not improve in visual acuity while two cases improved and in two cases there was deterioration in visual acuity noted. Six out of the 13 cases SES did not detect any organisms. It can also be seen that 5 out of six negatives improved in visual acuity with treatment.Conclusion: SES was an accurate, quick and reliable diagnostic method in endophthalmitis whose sensitivity was much higher than culture and Gram’s staining. This diagnostic technique can help in administering targeted therapies at a much earlier stage and hence improve the overall outcome of the endophthalmitis cases.References
1. Durand ML. Endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Mar;19(3):227-34. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12118.
2. Safneck JR. Endophthalmitis: A review of recent trends. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;26(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
3. Davis JL. Diagnostic dilemmas in retinitis and endophthalmitis. Eye (Lond). 2012 Feb;26(2):194-201. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.299. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
4. Almeida DR, Miller D, Alfonso EC. Anterior chamber and vitreous concordance in endophthalmitis: implications for prophylaxis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep; 128(9):1136-9.
5. Ravikumar BV. “Syndrome evaluation system (SES)” A paradigm shift in diagnosis of critical infections. Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011; 23(1); 77-78.
6. Wu ZH, Chan RP, Luk FO, Liu DT, Chan CK, Lam DS, Lai TY. Review of Clinical Features, Microbiological Spectrum, and Treatment Outcomes of Endogenous Endophthalmitis over an 8-Year Period. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:265078. doi: 10.1155/2012/265078. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7. Mahalingam P, Sambhav K. Diagnosis of post-operative polymicrobial endophthalmitis by xcyton analysis. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2013;1:21-2.
8. Cornut PL, Boisset S, Romanet JP, Maurin M, Carricajo A, Benito Y, Vandenesch F, Chiquet C. Principles and applications of molecular biology techniques for the microbiological diagnosis of acute post-operative endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec 17. pii: S0039-6257(13)00200-2. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.08.002. [Epub ahead of print]
9. Asencio-Egea MA, Huertas-Vaquero M, Carranza-González R, Cells-Sánchez J, González-del Valle F, Tenías-Burillo JM, Barberá-Farré JR. Endogenous endophthalmitis: case report and brief review of a serious ocular disease. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2013 Oct;30(5):516-21. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182013000500009
2. Safneck JR. Endophthalmitis: A review of recent trends. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;26(2):181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.02.011. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
3. Davis JL. Diagnostic dilemmas in retinitis and endophthalmitis. Eye (Lond). 2012 Feb;26(2):194-201. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.299. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
4. Almeida DR, Miller D, Alfonso EC. Anterior chamber and vitreous concordance in endophthalmitis: implications for prophylaxis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep; 128(9):1136-9.
5. Ravikumar BV. “Syndrome evaluation system (SES)” A paradigm shift in diagnosis of critical infections. Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011; 23(1); 77-78.
6. Wu ZH, Chan RP, Luk FO, Liu DT, Chan CK, Lam DS, Lai TY. Review of Clinical Features, Microbiological Spectrum, and Treatment Outcomes of Endogenous Endophthalmitis over an 8-Year Period. J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:265078. doi: 10.1155/2012/265078. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7. Mahalingam P, Sambhav K. Diagnosis of post-operative polymicrobial endophthalmitis by xcyton analysis. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2013;1:21-2.
8. Cornut PL, Boisset S, Romanet JP, Maurin M, Carricajo A, Benito Y, Vandenesch F, Chiquet C. Principles and applications of molecular biology techniques for the microbiological diagnosis of acute post-operative endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec 17. pii: S0039-6257(13)00200-2. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.08.002. [Epub ahead of print]
9. Asencio-Egea MA, Huertas-Vaquero M, Carranza-González R, Cells-Sánchez J, González-del Valle F, Tenías-Burillo JM, Barberá-Farré JR. Endogenous endophthalmitis: case report and brief review of a serious ocular disease. Rev Chilena Infectol. 2013 Oct;30(5):516-21. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182013000500009
Published
2016-01-02
Issue
Section
Original Article
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).