Role of Fine Needle Aspiration in The Diagnosis of Metaplastic Carcinoma of Breast

  • Sreerekha Jinkala Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)
  • Siddaraju Neelaiah Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)
  • Bhawana A Badhe Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)
Keywords: Metaplastic carcinoma, breast, fine needle aspiration, epithelial, mesenchymal, spindle cells

Abstract

Metaplastic carcinomas of breast are rare primary malignant tumors of breast with high rate of recurrences and metastasis. It poses diagnostic difficulties in histopathology as well as in cytopathology because of its varied morphological features. We present a case of a 54 year old woman diagnosed as metaplastic carcinoma of breast by fine needle aspiration and subsequently by histopathology. Our case shows  predominantly mesenchymal components like spindle shaped cells, chondroid matrix material and numerous osteoclastic giant cells  along with a scanty malignant epithelial component, which was better appreciated on the FNA material , by which a definitive diagnosis of metaplastic carcinoma of breast was possible on FNA. The epithelial component was underrepresented in the subsequent trucut biopsy, thus emphasizing the adjuvant role of FNA in diagnosing these tumors. In this report we discuss the challenges involved in diagnosing metaplastic carcinoma of breast on FNA.

Author Biographies

Sreerekha Jinkala, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, JIPMER, Puducherry
Siddaraju Neelaiah, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)
Department of Pathology
Bhawana A Badhe, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)
Department of Pathology

References

1. Tavassoli FA.Classification of metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. Pathol Annual 1992; 27 : 89–119
2. Oberman HA. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Path 1987; 11: 351–8
3. Foschini MP, Dina RE, Eusebi V. Sarcomatoid neoplasms of the breast: proposed definitions for biphasic and monophasic sarcomatoid mammary carcinomas. Seminars in Diag Pathol 1993;10: 128–36
4. Wargotz ES, Deos PH, Norris HJ. Metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. II. Spindle cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol 1989; 20:732-40
5. Barnes PJ, Boutilier R, Chaisson D, Rayson D. Metaplastic breast carcinoma: Clinico-pathological characteristics and Her2/Neu expression. Breast cancer research and treatment 2005; 91:173-8
6. Rayson D, Adjei AA, Suman VJ, Wold LE, Ingle JN. Metaplastic breast cancer: Prognosis and response to systemic therapy. Annal Oncol 1999;10: 413–9.
7. Lale S, Kure K, Lingamfelter D. Challenges to diagnose metaplastic carcinoma of the breast through cytologic methods: an eight-case series. Diagnostic Pathology 2011; 6:7.
8. Carter MR, Hornick JL, Lester S, Fletcher CD: Spindle cell (sarcomatoid) carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 29 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2006; 30:300-9.
9. Akerman M, Domnski H. Soft tissues. Orell SR, Sterrett GF. Orell and Sterretts Fine needle aspiration cytology. 5th edition: Churchill Livingstone, Elesiver Ltd. Pg 387-411.
Published
2018-07-16
Section
Case Report